Saturday, August 22, 2020

A Raisin in the Sun Analysis Responses Essay

A Raisin in the Sun Analysis Responses Essay A Raisin in the Sun Analysis Responses Essay Ryan Pagois A Raisin in the Sun Scholarly Analysis Questions Question #1: Beneatha’s two admirers, Asagai and George, both contribute extremely restricting perspectives of American life and propose totally various things as Beneatha’s admirers. Asagai thinks about his African legacy with respect and plans to spare Beneatha from turning into a â€Å"assimilationist† in this American culture and rather needs her to grasp her genealogical past, and even welcomes her to move back to Nigeria with him. He prods her with inquiries concerning her hair, asking her for what good reason she â€Å"mutilate[s] it each week† and won't wear it normally (62). As he presents Beneatha with Nigerian robes, she starts to consider her to be as a wonderful and progressively glorious thought, and not really as something to move past or disregard. She later acknowledges Asagai’s words and trims her hair, which shows the measure of impact that he had on Beneatha’s sees on both her past and her present. Alongside this, Asaigai sees Beneatha as an exceptionally delightful lady, and an important accomplice, and somebody to remain close by. He sees the possibility of instruction as important, and fundamental so as to completely comprehend the types of behavior that most people will accept as normal. George, then again, detests his association with Africa and concentrates more on the present and proceeding onward into what's to come. He is very discourteous and candi d against Beneatha’s sees on assimilationism and her African legacy. At the point when she raises the subject, he taunts her with snide remarks toward the â€Å"great Ashanti empiresí ¾ the incomparable Songhay civilizationsí ¾ and the incredible model of B à © nin† and the â€Å"poetry of the Bantu† (81). Alongside being a complete assimilationist, George sees ladies as somebody to help a man and obey him as opposed to be his accomplice. He holds training in a high respect, yet he accepts more in cash than in information. These convictions madden Beneatha, and at long last, she dismisses George, considering him a â€Å"fool† and hating both him and his convictions. Question #2: At the point when Mr. Linder shows up at the Youngers’ home, he is at first ready to mask his goals and conceal his supremacist and hostile proposition to make his concept of having an area â€Å"a specific sort of way† appear to be significantly more sensible. From the outset, Mr. Linder satisfies the Younger family with his apparently kind expectations as he discusses how individuals misjudge each other far again and again and it is essentially in light of the fact that â€Å"people just don’t plunk down and converse with each other† (116). This pinnacles the enthusiasm of the Youngers as they keep on listening eagerly to Mr. Linder’s introduction. Before long, be that as it may, the Younger family observes through Linder’s cautious word decision and come to understand the genuine motivation behind his visit. Linder starts to talk about the individuals of Clybourne Park having a â€Å"common background† and needing their neighborhood a particular way. Linder then lets his actual goals radiate through as he tells the More youthful family that the residents of Clybourne Park, â€Å"rightly or wrongly†, accept that â€Å"Negro families are more joyful when they live in their own communities† (118). The Youngers respond protectively by removing him from their home. In spite of the negative climate around Linder’s visit, it results in the encouraged and reinforced want to oppose society’s desires and complete their arrangement to move into their home in Clybourne Park, and it likewise united the family as they keep on holding over their encounters as they have been all through the play. Concerning Linder and his longing for an ideal neighborhood, his expectations are not totally adrift. The occupants of an area reserve the privilege to control parts of their locale to a degree. The line is drawn, be that as it may, at where a person’s lifestyle is compromised or tested. Physical highlights of the area can be modified, however the occupants themselves ought not feel compelled into changing their way of life to coordinate that of the area. Question #3:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.